#HALO 2 PC CHOPPY FULL#

so, 30fps by itself, is smooth enough to not piss most people off but 60fps caters to everyone. if you can't see something that someone else can, who are you to be the one that is right? you're not unfortunately, 30fps is not smooth on pans, especially when compared to 60fps. Everybody has an opinion on framerates but unfortunely many of these opinions are just ignorant, sorry. 30fps on pans still induces a double-vision effect. You often know your stuff.but COME ON NOW!ДЈ0 fps is NOT choppy, period, I dont care if you compare it to 1000 fps, 30fps is the ideal smooth framerate every developer tries achieve, anything higher is icing on the cake. JonesCK1 posted on 11/5/04 11:30am '30 FPS is choppy as hell' Ominous1 Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist!

#HALO 2 PC CHOPPY FULL#

Roger Ebert's full review of Maxivision 48: 48 fps film

With MV48, we could read the writing on the shirt, see every picket in the fence, see the drops of water as if in real life and read the side of the truck. Not great art, but great headaches for cinematographers, who know that picket fences will seem to 'flutter' if panned too quickly, that water droplets will blur, and that the sign on the side of a moving truck cannot be read. In the background, a truck drives out of a parking lot. The camera continues to move past a white picket fence. The camera tilts down as Billingsley picks up a hose to water a lawn. He is passed by another guy, wearing a T-shirt with something written on it. We see actor Peter Billingsley walking toward the camera, wearing a patterned shirt. Motion is shown without the jumpiness and blurring of existing film projection, details are sharper, and our eyes are bathed in visual persuasion. It produces a picture so breathtakingly clear it is like 3-D in reverse: like looking through an open window into the real world. they wouldn't be considering uping the framerate to 48fps just for fun. Tell me, have you ever noticed the double-vision effect in a movie? 24fps doesn't cut it there either. but if you would try and notice the pans, you will see the landscape has a huge double vision effect that can be easily seen in that little fps file I've posted above. it is very hard to detect a lower framerate when moving forward.

No, to you maybe, to me and many, there is double-vision effects on all the pans and overall, it's simply not nearly as smooth as 60fps (not even close, 60fps is a sight to behold, 30fps is the minimum requirement that is passeable). TheShropshireSlasher posted on 11/5/04 10:51am A rock-solid 30fps is as smooth as glass. if the ****ing devs would just standardize it to 60fps, nobody would ever ****ing complain! The ones that can't see it are just as happy as before BUT the ones that can tell, will finally get what videogame movement deserves, 60fps!Дў2FPS VS 33FPS VS 66FPS this is a 40kb tiny file that totally illustrates the difference in framerates everybody sees it differently, so get over yourself. We wouldn't have frameratewar threads every flipping games if everybody saw the same thing. everyone is different and just because you are the lucky one and can't see the difference between 30 and 60 or under 30, doesn't mean you are right. I am so sick of you yahoos that can't detect bad framerates claiming that we are the ones with the bad eyes. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I wouldn't of chosen 'choppy as hell' but I will tell you that 30fps is not even close to the smoothness of 60fps. many people can detect huge differences in framerate. BLUECATS posted on 11/5/04 10:50am '30 FPS is choppy as hell compared to 60, or say 85.'

Halo 2 pc choppy